This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This question of power and authority is vital in identity systems. We can ask "what do we give up and to whom in a given identity system?" I argued that the architecture of SSI, its structure, made those relationships more authentic. Figure 1: Binding of controller, authentication factors, and identifiers in identity systems.
And yet those systems are not ours, but rather belong to the companies that provide them. I call these systems "administrative" because they are built to administer our experience in a particular domain for the administrator's specific purposes. Not altogether unpleasant, but a far cry from authentic.
Trusted computing stands as a pivotal milestone in the ever-evolving landscape of digital security, strategically weaving hardware and software mechanisms into the very fabric of computing systems. The TCB’s features require initial operating system installation.
Because DIDs are cryptographic artifacts tied to public-private key pairs, this exchange provides the agents with the means to perform mutual authentication and create an encrypted channel. This is sometimes referred to as self-sovereign identity (SSI). These agents exchange decentralized identifiers (DIDs) to create a relationship 2.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 83,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content