This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is often the case with application development. As the project moves through the software development life cycle (SDLC), requirement changes become increasingly more expensive and deliverable times become more protracted. Users do not want the system and use scope creep to perpetually stall the completion of the application.
I recently spoke to Gartner on the addition of fuzz testing to their Critical Capabilities for the Application Security Testing Magic Quadrant. When organizations choose to implement fuzzing in the SDLC, they’re coming in with a different level of commitment. They’re just too valuable. This is key.
Based on these numbers, the average SAST tool is likely to find only 14 percent of the vulnerabilities in an application’s code. This has given rise to the application security space. It then becomes a question of code coverage - is your application security solution providing protect your organization?
High performers like Google and the Microsoft SDLC do this by continuously fuzzing their software with their own customized system. Then, by definition, that scan could find all bugs, which is something any developer will tell you is impossible. It’s not the right benchmark.
And so there's often an application of responsibility for certain things. An attack on this chip has definite consequences on the future of driving, particularly with autonomous vehicles. And anytime you have an interface, even if it's well defined even if there's a specification. Engineers start to assume things about the other side.
And so there's often an application of responsibility for certain things. An attack on this chip has definite consequences on the future of driving, particularly with autonomous vehicles. And anytime you have an interface, even if it's well defined even if there's a specification. Engineers start to assume things about the other side.
And so there's often an application of responsibility for certain things. An attack on this chip has definite consequences on the future of driving, particularly with autonomous vehicles. And anytime you have an interface, even if it's well defined even if there's a specification. Engineers start to assume things about the other side.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 83,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content